Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 21:32
Run Duration373 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 137
2-Core 251
92% 161 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 707
70% 573 Pts
64-Core 738
46% 738 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3550 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 130
Parallax 152
132% 148 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 146
Splatting 120
120% 151 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 122%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$152
840GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2204 2202 1172 1185 1185 1166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 2,454
Write 2,353
Mixed 1,620
SusWrite 1519
446% 1,987 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 96.3
321% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,485
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 1199
887% 1,185 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 343%
Great: 372%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$120
3TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 192 188 199 191 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 177
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 194
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.7
232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
264GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 127 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 156
Write 135
Mixed 111
SusWrite 126
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 181 180 185 184 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 113
Write 159
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 181
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1
265% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 136 136 136 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 136
Write 143
Mixed 134
SusWrite 134
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.8
334% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 970GB
705GB free
Firmware: MCC3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 119 123 124 124 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 69.6
Write 125
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 120
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
198% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 74%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
73GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 41 41 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
66% Good
Read 144
Write 55.6
Mixed 92.1
SusWrite 42.1
100% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 10.7
776% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 11.9
840% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 66%
Great: 113%
SMI 64GB
58GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 0 4.1 9.4 9.6 9.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
7.2% Terrible
Read 28.3
Write 1.7
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 6.2
12% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.2%
Great: 7%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
7GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 4.9 4.7 4.4 4.5 4.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
7.81% Terrible
Read 35.3
Write 5.2
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 5.1
14% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 32
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 30.3
90% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,132
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback