Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H (all builds)
Memory	18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130724
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '21 at 20:03
Run Duration	310 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 91.3 2-Core 174 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 448 47% 377 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Lighting 64.1 Reflection 74.8 Parallax 65.3 52% 68.1 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 65.2 Splatting 57.1 51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 247GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,971 Write 4,617 Mixed 4,706 1,064% 4,764 MB/s	4K Read 280 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 195 765% 215 MB/s	DQ Read 702 DQ Write 440 DQ Mixed 545 413% 562 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 758GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 123 124 125 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 123 Write 118 Mixed 94.1 SusWrite 124 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 202 215 214 218 218 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 153 Mixed 79.9 SusWrite 212 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 106%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB 8,040 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 17GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 23 Write 10.4 Mixed 6 SusWrite 11.5 15% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.5 163% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 19%
ST932042 1AS 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 286GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 44 43 43 43 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.5% Poor	Read 86.1 Write 78.3 Mixed 47 SusWrite 42.9 82% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 27%
ASMT 2115 320GB 741 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 114GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 54 58 58 58 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	25% Poor	Read 58.2 Write 56.4 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 56.9 68% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 41%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 32GB-$20 701 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 11GB free, PID 1a09 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 28 27 27 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 25.9 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 27.1 37% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.6 168% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 51%
ASMedia AS2115 640GB 498GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 97 95 95 95 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.4% Average	Read 100 Write 99.5 Mixed 58.1 SusWrite 94.6 118% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 115% 1.33 MB/s

IOMEGA ZIP 250 0GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 1% 0GB free, PID 0030 Operating at USB 1.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 0.7 1% 0.65 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 24GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 18.6 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 17.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z77X-UD3H Builds (Compare 1,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H - $350

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	489x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	434x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	274x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	99x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	93x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	88x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	58x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x
MX500 1TBCrucial $80Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	36x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	47x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	45x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $700

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397