Lenovo 1095-1N5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 1095-1N5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170327
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 16:14
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 49.1
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 147
48% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 485
47% 387 Pts
64-Core 1,124
70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 37.7
32% 39.7 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 39.6
34% 42.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 83 95 107 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 219
Write 152
Mixed 153
SusWrite 97
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 15.4
60% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 112
89% 124 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
225GB free
Firmware: K1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 408 398 406 415 418 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 315
Write 170
Mixed 320
SusWrite 411
69% 304 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 26
92% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 169
157% 237 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 102%
WD Elements 500GB
198GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 21
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 26.3
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170EH1- 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 25.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.8
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1095-1N5 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 1095-1N5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback