Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 04:45
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 226
86% 149 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 700
70% 568 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4691
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.7
6% 7.97 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 7
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 215
Parallax 203
184% 214 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 158
Splatting 141
133% 166 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 153%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$80
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1900 1709 1708 1721 1655 1652 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 1,913
Write 1,995
Mixed 1,622
SusWrite 1,724
409% 1,814 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 71.5
251% 93.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,261
DQ Write 915
DQ Mixed 1,073
806% 1,083 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 308%
Great: 347%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
8GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 464
Mixed 342
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 54.4
188% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 238
210% 313 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
112GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 196 81 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 454
Mixed 414
SusWrite 165
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 56.7
194% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 358
267% 354 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
63GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 164 164 168 169 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 98.4
Write 71.9
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 165
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
584GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 167 169 169 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 25.2
Write 60.5
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 167
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1
218% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 110%
Maplin USB Flash Drive 8GB
3GB free, PID 102f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.9 4.1 4.4 4.1 3.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.44% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 4.3
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 3.9
9% 8.33 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.44%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 33.4
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 43.9
SC Mixed 30.4
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $867
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback