Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory15.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170517
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateOct 28 '21 at 01:06
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 128
2-Core 222
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 552
57% 460 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340
PowerColor(148C 2357) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1525 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.1
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 91
58% 78.7 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 46.7
46% 57 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 72 66 64 63 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 292
Write 82.5
Mixed 154
SusWrite 70.8
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 23.8
102% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 104
92% 144 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
8GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 432
Write 392
Mixed 389
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 56.6
192% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 356
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
55GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 441 423 378 326 317 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 387
Write 388
Mixed 334
SusWrite 382
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 58.5
180% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$90
28GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 62 66 64 65 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 53
Write 52.5
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 64.7
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 75%
Ssk-dk10 0 4TB
95GB free
Firmware: 010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 90 91 92 92 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 116
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 88.9
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 118%
Ssk-dk10 0 4TB
183GB free
Firmware: 010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 90 91 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 58.2
Write 78.5
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 88.6
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.3% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback