Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z230 SFF Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Z230 SFF Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1906
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '22 at 02:44
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203 3,014 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	47% Average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 16.8 2-Core 46.8 29% 41.5 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 435 35% 306 Pts	64-Core 477 30% 477 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340 26,573 User benchmarks, average bench 54% XFX(1682 9395) CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.2% Average	Lighting 61.9 Reflection 67.7 Parallax 78.4 50% 69.3 fps	MRender 60.1 Gravity 61.8 Splatting 42.8 44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 187 192 183 198 198 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.6% Below average	Read 171 Write 193 Mixed 160 SusWrite 192 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 19.4 4K Mixed 10.6 36% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 54.7 DQ Mixed 33 27% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 97%
Crucial M500 480GB-$81 9,168 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 35GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 229 211 114 112 106 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.4% Below average	Read 190 Write 233 Mixed 196 SusWrite 167 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 16.5 55% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 87.3 DQ Mixed 28.2 30% 46.6 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 4x8GB 1,052 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 14.7 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 5.5 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z230 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z230 SFF Workstation

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $115Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	174x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	111x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	98x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	159x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	91x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	74x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $47Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	19x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	13x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	19x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	18x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $296	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350