Asus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 23:09
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$235
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 187
2-Core 369
110% 211 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 1,074
103% 850 Pts
64-Core 1694
105% 1694 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
EVGA(3842 2081) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 161
Parallax 160
128% 159 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 139
Splatting 119
116% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 155 152 148 145 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 476
Write 152
Mixed 228
SusWrite 160
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 37.5
147% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 242
183% 252 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB-$67
197GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 472 464 471 475 474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 395
Write 310
Mixed 311
SusWrite 471
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 51
179% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 257
215% 311 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 115%
Great: 121%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 174 180 181 181 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 134
Write 111
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 177
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.9
285% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 139 141 140 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 129
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 141
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 101%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 171 170 171 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 157
Write 162
Mixed 126
SusWrite 170
210% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$44
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 28
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 8R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
49% 42% 31 313 237 144 27" 1920 1080 ACR0406 Acer XB270H A
History: Score 53: 7R 4G 6B | Score 49: 8R 2G 3B
Typical ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 8,671 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,260
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback