Toshiba Satellite C55-B

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	1.12% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 69% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-B (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '21 at 21:33
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	100%
CPU Throttled	69%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281 64,450 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Memory 74.8 1-Core 51.3 2-Core 88.6 47% 71.6 Pts	4-Core 88.7 8-Core 129 14% 109 Pts	64-Core 93.1 6% 93.1 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 F920) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	2.28% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 4.2 2% 2.97 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 3.1 3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.28% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Memory Ghost SSD 256GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0701A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 1.8 5.9 4.2 12 6.7 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	1.12% Terrible	Read 6 Write 14.5 Mixed 10.4 SusWrite 7 2% 9.48 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 2% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 1.12% Great: 83%
Specific STORAGE DEVICE 32GB 1,268 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 15GB free, PID 0918 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0.6 1.7 0.8 0.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2 Write 0.7 SusWrite 1.1 1% 1.27 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905469-136.A00LF Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.8% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 14.5 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 7.7 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 90.8 44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 6: 0R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	15%	13	43	27	60	15.6"	1366 768	LGD039F

History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 6: 0R 2G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-B Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-B

CPU
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	98x
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	96x
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	53x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	198x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	155x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	20x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	99x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	47x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350