Asus G56JK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G56JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G56JK
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140513
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '18 at 10:59
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 175
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 257
35% 258 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Asus(1043 22CA) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9101
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 16
Parallax 17.4
17% 18.1 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 15.7
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$88
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 431 472 482 481 468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 478
Mixed 410
SusWrite 461
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 57.1
192% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-136.A00LF Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G56JK Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G56JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback