AZW GT-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAZW GT-R  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW GT-R
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210719
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 13:46
Run Duration334 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 596
65% 514 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 24
13% 18.4 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 13.7
12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0417A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 574 223 216 217 239 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1619
Write 1,260
Mixed 1,018
SusWrite 271
232% 1,042 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 27.3
176% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 808
DQ Write 693
DQ Mixed 495
441% 665 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 166%
Great: 211%
TRANSCEN D 32GB
20GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.3 7.2 6.7 7.8 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 7.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 7.4
11% 9.35 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
39% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HTS723232L9A360 320GB
163GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 26.3
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 16.8
32% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 16%
KINGSTON SA400S37120G 120GB
93GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 36.3
Write 27.7
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 17
36% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 13.3
1,059% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 12.6
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 14.3
1,115% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 30.4
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 28.8
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 10% 21 109 62 60 36.1" 1920 1080 TCL0000 50S425CA
History: Score 5: 0R 1G 2B | Score 11: 1R 2G 0B | Score 19: 2R 3G 0B | Score 4: 0R 1G 1B
Typical GT-R Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: AZW GT-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback