Today's hottest deals

Tulpar A5 V19.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemTulpar A5 V19.1  (all builds)
MotherboardTULPAR A5 V19.1
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '23 at 15:23
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 73.2
1-Core 175
2-Core 347
103% 198 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 853
93% 737 Pts
64-Core 1160
72% 1160 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 94%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Device(1D05 1177) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1289
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45.2% Average
Lighting 58.2
Reflection 53.5
Parallax 49.7
47% 53.8 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 42.7
41% 51.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
812GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1513 1655 1690 649 43 803 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,090
Write 1,726
Mixed 1,261
SusWrite 1,059
291% 1284 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 73.8
292% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 713
DQ Write 1,355
DQ Mixed 877
710% 981 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 243%
Great: 299%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 35.1
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 24.9
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A5 V19.1 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Tulpar A5 V19.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback