Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Empty empty

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Empty empty (all builds)
Motherboard	TYAN S7010
Memory	22.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090924
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 06:23
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5520 2,226 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 78.9 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 113 53% 84.2 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 346 32% 270 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.7% Above average	Lighting 70.5 Reflection 73.9 Parallax 67.8 58% 70.7 fps	MRender 61.3 Gravity 72.2 Splatting 68.4 55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 87 78 99 91 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 145 Write 142 Mixed 131 SusWrite 89.5 29% 127 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 18.6 59% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 19.4 DQ Write 42.5 DQ Mixed 24.4 20% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 85%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 13GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 312 Write 290 Mixed 290 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 20.3 66% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 157 116% 151 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 99%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 407GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 109 109 110 107 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 82.2 Write 56.4 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 108 55% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 83%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB 7,087 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 190GB free Firmware: 04.05G05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 42 37 44 27 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 38.9 Write 45.5 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 34.5 25% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 42% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 63%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 178GB free Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 47 43 48 34 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 71.1 Write 27.6 Mixed 30.3 SusWrite 40.7 31% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 54%
FCR-HS3 -0 64GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 58GB free, PID 6348 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 2 2.2 1.9 2 2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.01% Terrible	Read 31.1 Write 4.2 Mixed 8.4 SusWrite 1.9 11% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.5 102% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.01% Great: 47%
FCR-HS3 -1 64GB 194 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 59GB free, PID 6348 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 16 18 15 16 16 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 29.1 Write 20.5 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 15.5 27% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 4.5 317% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	40.4% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 6.1 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	3%	79	272	171	60	24.1"	1920 1200	ENC2111 S2433W

History: Score 14: 1R 2G 3B | Score 6: 1R 0G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical empty Builds (Compare 572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	38x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	28x
Core i3-3220Intel $92Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	23x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	54x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	35x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	42x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	32x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370