Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro4,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemApple MacPro4,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F221BEC8
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '20 at 02:19
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5520
CPU-A (00), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 121
57% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 458
42% 350 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
Apple(106B 00D0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.250.28.1000
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 25.3
22% 22.8 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 19.1
15% 17.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston DataTraveler G3 16GB
11GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.4 6.4 8.1 8.1 7.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
6.14% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 8.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 6.4
10% 8.43 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
58% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.14%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.8% Above average
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 21.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro4,1 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacPro4,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback