Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z370 HD3-OP-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 HD3-OP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 HD3-OP-CF  (all builds)
Memory51.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 19:57
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$145
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 83
1-Core 133
2-Core 254
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 788
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.5% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 58
Parallax 98.7
53% 74 fps
MRender 54.9
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 45
45% 56.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 47 62 53 15 2.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 426
Write 73.8
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 31.4
32% 151 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 18.3
52% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 75.5
DQ Mixed 1
26% 63.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 55%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$57
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 166 164 166 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 158
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 165
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 108%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
336GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 73 73 71 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 127
Write 93.5
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 72.5
123% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 60%
WD easystore 264D 12TB
5.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 173 174 173 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 174
Write 178
Mixed 196
SusWrite 173
249% 180 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.3
292% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2800 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 17.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 2 75 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical GA-Z370 HD3-OP-CF Builds (Compare 441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 HD3-OP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback