ACER Aspire M3641

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemACER Aspire M3641  (all builds)
MotherboardACER MCP73PV
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080911
Uptime2 Days
Run DateAug 12 '17 at 16:58
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 33
2-Core 66
36% 54.4 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 125
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 3650
Asus(1043 01DA) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 1.19
2% 2.66 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.52 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 152
Write 156
Mixed 151
115% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.31
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.34
140% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
757GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 86.3
Write 83.6
Mixed 75.9
62% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.17
76% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 59%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 3800
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
8% Terrible
Read 19
Write 5.1
Mixed 12.2
14% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.18
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.5
68% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 8%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3641 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: ACER Aspire M3641

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback