Asus P9X79 LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 LE (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140724
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '16 at 20:11
Run Duration	1306 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 187 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 601 60% 487 Pts	64-Core 710 44% 710 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 427GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4923 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 707 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 61 21 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 98 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7243311482	76.5% Very good	Read 501 Write 303 Mixed 308 82% 371 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 20.4 98% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 80.7 92% 160 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 126%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9844 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1242 (B1) Unknown 95 95 163 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 64 21 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 639 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8267297902	63.4% Good	Read 495 Write 235 Mixed 217 69% 315 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 17.4 74% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 70.3 DQ Mixed 54 66% 120 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 76%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 8795 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 247 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 707 (0A) Spinup retry count 104 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 104 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 11 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 13 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 518 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 171799674912 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 228 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 212 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	87.3% Excellent	Read 152 Write 152 Mixed 73.7 93% 126 MB/s	4K Read 2.43 4K Write 2.23 4K Mixed 0.34 180% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 109%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 3800 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	2.07% Terrible	Read 0.62 Write 0.86 Mixed 2.03 2% 1.17 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 0.53 4K Mixed 0.005 21% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.07% Great: 8%
OCZ RALLY2 8GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 7GB free, PID ac02 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	7.49% Terrible	Read 26.1 Write 9.31 Mixed 12.4 17% 16 MB/s	4K Read 6.77 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.02 27% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.49% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB 7,519 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	MC Read 35.2 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 31 95% 33.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 11 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 LE Builds (Compare 1,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 LE - $99

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	349x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	277x
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	202x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	80x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	72x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	54x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	43x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	36x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	26x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $436

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363