Asrock X299 Taichi XE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive350% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X299 Taichi XE  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '21 at 11:26
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 134
2-Core 268
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 1,069
94% 798 Pts
64-Core 1,757
109% 1,757 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
AMD(1002 0B37) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 86.7
53% 71.5 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 46.6
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2195 2177 2172 2150 1755 1215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
350% Outstanding
Read 2,398
Write 2,180
Mixed 1,476
SusWrite 1,944
449% 2,000 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 80
294% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,192
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 1,044
774% 1,029 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 350%
Great: 393%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
34GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,980
Write 1,438
Mixed 684
301% 1,367 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 51.7
224% 86.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 670
586% 876 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$82
53GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 105 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 104
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$82
56GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 138 141 143 141 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 126
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 140
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 88%
USB Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 6025
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 1
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1.5
3% 3.17 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.2% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 21.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 11.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 2R 2G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 10% 122 335 271 60 27" 2560 1440 ACI27B3 ROG PG27AQ
Typical X299 Taichi XE Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 168%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Taichi XE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,761
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback