Today's hottest deals

Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '21 at 15:33
Run Duration334 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$152
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 262
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 748
73% 599 Pts
64-Core 750
46% 750 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 142
Parallax 143
107% 139 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 139
Splatting 120
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
348GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 479 480 484 483 472 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 514
Write 489
Mixed 455
SusWrite 477
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 66.4
222% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 122%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 89 88 87 85 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 343
Mixed 394
SusWrite 124
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 60.5
205% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 356
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 251 162 166 341 372 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 161
Mixed 284
SusWrite 293
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 59.3
200% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 360
271% 364 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
78GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 131 133 133 132 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 61.3
Write 63.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 132
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
250GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 97 97 98 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 162
Write 133
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 98
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 139 139 135 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 99.8
Write 101
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 137
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
338% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 89%
WD Elements 1048 1.5TB
70GB free, PID 1048
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 39.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 41.4
52% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 27.1
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 28.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 6R 7G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
59% 60% 35 104 0 144 27" 2560 1440 ENC2729 FS2735
History: Score 36: 4R 4G 4B | Score 68: 8R 6G 10B | Score 59: 6R 7G 8B
Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $913
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $217Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback