MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 10:13
Run Duration354 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 86.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 282
93% 170 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 1,000
94% 779 Pts
64-Core 2,124
131% 2,124 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 53.1
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 47.9
43% 51.5 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 47.4
42% 51.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 1TB
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1957 1684 1448 1653 1631 1455 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 70% Great: 70%
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB
772GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4420 4395 4401 4409 4389 3747 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
490% Outstanding
Read 2,566
Write 4,443
Mixed 1967
SusWrite 4,294
754% 3,317 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 72.9
254% 90.5 MB/s
DQ Read 815
DQ Write 1,290
DQ Mixed 1,032
787% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 490%
Great: 490%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
583GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 69 73 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 89
Write 86.5
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 72.6
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 59%
Amd-raid Array 4 1TB
451GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 71 74 76 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 70.5
Write 94.3
Mixed 59
SusWrite 73.7
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 96%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 16GB
4GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 6.1 7.1 6.9 7.4 7.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 18.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 7.7
24% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.3
157% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 19%
Verbatim STORE N GO 249GB
23GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 0.1 2.6 3.8 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 257
Write 134
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 6.9
125% 116 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
35% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 39.3
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 36
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 37% 19 29 9 60 27" 2560 1440 AOC2701 Q27P1B
Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback