Today's hottest deals

Asus BM6875_BM6675_BP6375

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus BM6875_BM6675_BP6375  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BM6875_BM6675_BP6375
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131205
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 20 '21 at 13:40
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 363
45% 343 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 17.5
15% 18 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 16.1
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$28
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 84 94 85 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 81.5
Write 111
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 90.8
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
184% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 70%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 320GB-$59
298GB free
Firmware: GM3OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 79.8
Write 79
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 79
51% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BM6875_BM6675_BP6375 Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus BM6875_BM6675_BP6375

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback