Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '19 at 13:58
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 202
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 400
55% 406 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.38
Parallax 6.59
3% 5.59 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.3
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$26
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 412 424 156 36 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 401
Write 418
Mixed 381
SusWrite 249
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 37.3
133% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 194
174% 259 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
420GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 120 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69% Good
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 73
SusWrite 120
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback