QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory14.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.3 GB free of 14.6484 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '21 at 09:50
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 80.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 285
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 869
91% 731 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 95%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 254 256 254 287 277 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 332
Write 236
Mixed 213
SusWrite 273
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 25.8
87% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 76.1
84% 149 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 68%
Red Hat VirtIO 160GB
81GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 141 140 140 140 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.1% Below average
Read 195
Write 155
Mixed 147
SusWrite 142
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 9.1
38% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 59
DQ Mixed 46
47% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x14GB
1 of 1 slots used
14GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 24.4
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 0" 1280 720
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback