QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 197%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory31.3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.3GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory28.4 GB free of 31.334 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 15:12
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 61.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
87% 167 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,159
103% 873 Pts
64-Core 2,284
141% 2,284 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 275
Reflection 242
Parallax 277
224% 265 fps
MRender 315
Gravity 236
Splatting 173
190% 241 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 190%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 38 32 31 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 438
Write 45.1
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 31.7
29% 138 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 5.9
31% 8.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 68%
Gigabyte GP-AG42TB 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4010 4086 4085 4088 4084 4088 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
462% Outstanding
Read 2,078
Write 3,630
Mixed 2,084
SusWrite 4,073
675% 2,967 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 77.9
280% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 952
DQ Mixed 972
731% 976 MB/s
Poor: 204%
This bench: 462%
Great: 522%
Red Hat VirtIO 240GB
63GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 143 98 101 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 431
Write 388
Mixed 315
SusWrite 143
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 24.9
86% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 147
112% 152 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 15702 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 31.7
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback