Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3568
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121024
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '21 at 09:49
Run Duration	582 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3300M APU-$90 1,991 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 47.7 1-Core 11.8 2-Core 22.4 21% 27.3 Pts	4-Core 22.4 8-Core 23.6 3% 23 Pts	64-Core 22.6 1% 22.6 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6480G 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 3568) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	1.96% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 2.1 2% 2.43 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.3 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.96% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 31 37 19 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 43.4 Write 41.3 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 26.8 26% 34.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 43%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 2GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.6 4.8 5.5 5.9 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	6.61% Terrible	Read 13.3 Write 4.5 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 5 9% 7.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.5 93% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.61% Great: 19%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 0GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 23 Write 3 Mixed 12 13% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB 9,471 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 4.1 3.9 4.4 2.5 4.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	1.15% Terrible	Read 2.5 Write 2.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 3.6 5% 3.53 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.15% Great: 21%
SanDisk Cruzer Dial 64GB 841 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 12GB free, PID 5599 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 5.1 6.2 3.2 4.2 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	5.47% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 8.5 Mixed 14 SusWrite 3.5 14% 12.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.2 58% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.47% Great: 17%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 290 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 6GB free, PID a20b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 7.8 8.3 8.8 7.9 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	6.21% Terrible	Read 26.7 Write 10.5 Mixed 7 SusWrite 8 15% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.21% Great: 10%
Netac OnlyDisk 125GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 19GB free, PID 3b00 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.4 5.5 0 0 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	5.73% Terrible	Read 28 Write 25.5 Mixed 25 SusWrite 5.6 27% 21 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 5.73% Great: 27%
USB DISK 3.0 124GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 8GB free, PID 6400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 7.6 7.8 11 11 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	6.11% Terrible	Read 23 Write 23 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 9.5 21% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.8 38% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.11% Great: 24%
Netac OnlyDisk 248GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 189GB free, PID 3200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.2 7.6 11 8.7 8.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 27 Write 18 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 8.6 25% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 81% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 38%
USB DISK 3.0 248GB 544 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 59GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 0.7 0.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	1.48% Terrible	Read 8.2 Write 7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 1 6% 5.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 1.48% Great: 30%
USB DISK 3.0 124GB 1,366 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 11GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 8.4 9.6 11 10 9.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	6.85% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 23 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 9.7 21% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.6 37% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.85% Great: 37%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB 4,824 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 103GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 8.3 6.2 8.5 8 9.2 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	7.72% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 13 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 8.2 19% 15 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 7.72% Great: 45%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 2GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 2.8 2.5 2.9 2.7 2.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	3.13% Terrible	Read 13.8 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 2.7 7% 6.12 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.13% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GB 8,698 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 4.5 13% 4.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 0.9 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion g7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC

CPU
Core i5-2430MIntel $55Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	63x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	57x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	57x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	224x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	166x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	69x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
BX500 240GBCrucial $23Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	16x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	37x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	27x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 1x4GBMicronBench 27%, 6,018 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350