Today's hottest deals

Acer Extensa 2508

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Extensa 2508  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Extensa 2508
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141215
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 16:26
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2840
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 5.6
2-Core 46
30% 40.6 Pts
4-Core 42.4
8-Core 34.9
5% 38.7 Pts
64-Core 27.6
2% 27.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Acer(1025 0936) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.48% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.48%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$13
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 90 46 54 58 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 56
Write 78.2
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 62.1
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 61%
Netac OnlyDisk 125GB
110GB free, PID 3b00
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 1.5 8 9.7 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.71% Terrible
Read 27
Write 20.7
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 9.8
26% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
41% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.71%
Great: 27%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
2GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.2
1% 0.43 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
19GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Mixed 0.2
0% 0.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 19%
Intenso Rainbow Line 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
0.21% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 0.2
0% 0.28 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.21%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 2508 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 2508

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback