Zotac XXXXXX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZotac XXXXXX  (all builds)
MotherboardZOTAC XXXXXX
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 16:23
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3150
¯¯¯¯¯¯SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
21.6% Poor
Memory 33.9
1-Core 18
2-Core 37.3
20% 29.7 Pts
4-Core 53.2
8-Core 67
8% 60.1 Pts
64-Core 74.7
5% 74.7 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Zotac(19DA B301) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2.7
1% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 221 253 255 249 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 290
Write 59.4
Mixed 310
SusWrite 253
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 27.7
86% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 128
98% 135 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 118%
Verbatim Store 'n' Go 4GB
3GB free, PID 1e23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.8 6.8 11 7.8 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 5.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 7.4
11% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 10%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
952GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 94 94 91 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 96.7
Write 97.4
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 92
114% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
25.6% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 233
17% 233 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 72.3" 1280 720 SNYF301 SONY TV
Typical XXXXXX Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Zotac XXXXXX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $139
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback