Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 16:32
Run Duration423 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 145
2-Core 287
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 771
72% 602 Pts
64-Core 1,059
66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)
95.7% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 119
Parallax 119
95% 118 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 119
Splatting 119
98% 119 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$319
534GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 273 162 165 348 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 461
Write 153
Mixed 202
SusWrite 275
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 45.1
136% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 199
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
278GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1580 1312 1276 1142 1149 1138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2,502
Write 2,422
Mixed 1,703
SusWrite 1,266
442% 1,973 MB/s
4K Read 63.9
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 89.5
299% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,371
DQ Write 1,178
DQ Mixed 1,257
947% 1,269 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 327%
Great: 372%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 147 191 163 146 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 490
Write 337
Mixed 271
SusWrite 158
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 38.3
139% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 117
109% 170 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81%
Great: 116%
WDC WDBN CE0010PNC 1TB
126GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 382
Write 298
Mixed 256
69% 312 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 29.8
98% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 38.7
69% 139 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 103%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 165 164 156 156 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 91.7
Write 96.2
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 158
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 105%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
346GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 34 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 36
Write 31
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 35.5
45% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R009D408GX2-4400C19A 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 31.7
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 28
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 6R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 15% 75 224 69 120 27" 1920 1080 ACR064D Acer XF270H B
History: Score 8: 1R 0G 3B | Score 54: 8R 4G 2B | Score 42: 6R 4G 0B | Score 41: 6R 3G 2B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,032
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback