Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA (all builds)
Memory	16.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200915
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '21 at 16:32
Run Duration	423 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 145 2-Core 287 91% 169 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 771 72% 602 Pts	64-Core 1,059 66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6593) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)	95.7% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 119 Parallax 119 95% 118 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 119 Splatting 119 98% 119 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$294 10,028 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 534GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 273 162 165 348 281 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 461 Write 153 Mixed 202 SusWrite 275 60% 273 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 45.1 136% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 199 149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 278GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1580 1312 1276 1142 1149 1138 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	327% Outstanding	Read 2502 Write 2,422 Mixed 1,703 SusWrite 1,266 442% 1,973 MB/s	4K Read 63.9 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 89.5 299% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,371 DQ Write 1,178 DQ Mixed 1,257 947% 1,269 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 327% Great: 372%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 147 191 163 146 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 490 Write 337 Mixed 271 SusWrite 158 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 38.3 139% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 117 109% 170 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 116%
WDC WDBN CE0010PNC 1TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 126GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 382 Write 298 Mixed 256 69% 312 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 29.8 98% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 38.7 69% 139 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 103%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 3.5TB free Firmware: SN04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 165 164 156 156 149 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 91.7 Write 96.2 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 158 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 105%
WD Elements 107C 4TB 3,603 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 346GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 34 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Read 36 Write 31 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 35.5 45% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown R009D408GX2-4400C19A 4x8GB 143 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 31.7 80% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 28 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 89.4 45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 41: 6R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
41%	15%	75	224	69	120	27"	1920 1080	ACR064D Acer XF270H B

History: Score 8: 1R 0G 3B | Score 54: 8R 4G 2B | Score 42: 6R 4G 0B | Score 41: 6R 3G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	571x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $375Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	530x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $164Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	460x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	327x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	272x
RTX 3070Nvidia $497Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	194x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $108Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	267x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	187x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	146x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	146x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	63x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $107Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $907

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353