HP 500-164

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 500-164  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory14.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 17:04
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 63
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 114
50% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 158
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
XFX(1682 3181) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
5.31% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 6.94
6% 7.04 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 6.37
Splatting 5.48
4% 5.54 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.31%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBN CE0010PNC 1TB
522GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 396 383 396 357 404 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 412
Write 368
Mixed 245
SusWrite 386
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 24.3
91% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 82.7
69% 102 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 188 187 187 186 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 126
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 187
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-17000CL11-4GBXL F3-17000CL11-4GBXL Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.9% Poor
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 10
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-164 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-164

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $384WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback