Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI GENE  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '17 at 10:23
Run Duration702 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 97.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 256
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 653
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 3614) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 39.3
26% 33.1 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 41
Splatting 34
31% 38.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 412
Mixed 411
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 53.7
207% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 110
140% 252 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
500GB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 85.1
Mixed 87.7
67% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.25
102% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
280GB free
Firmware: AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 79.8
Write 99.6
Mixed 91.7
68% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.17
72% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
239GB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 114
Write 99.6
Mixed 95.2
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.19
76% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 67%
WD Red 5TB (2014)-$185
65GB free
Firmware: 0A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 153
Write 120
Mixed 118
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.25
86% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 98%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
12GB free
Firmware: 1E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 40.4
Mixed 39.1
30% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.38
88% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 33%
WDC WD80 0JD-55MUA1 80GB
59GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.5% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 39
Mixed 31.2
46% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.36
54% 0.71 MB/s
BUFFALO HDW-PDU3 1TB
27GB free, PID 0258
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 108
Write 103
Mixed 7.12
83% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 0.43
4K Mixed 0.16
22% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 40%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
8.58% Terrible
Read 22
Write 3.83
Mixed 4.62
9% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.65
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.05
90% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
3GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 121
Write 32.8
Mixed 54.9
74% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.01
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 1.51
132% 2.78 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 36%
FCR-HS3 -1 4GB
2GB free, PID 6348
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 10.2
Mixed 1.99
10% 9.87 MB/s
4K Read 2.52
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.12
14% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/8GX 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 KHX2400C11D3/8GX 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 32GB
2400, 1600, 2400, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 26.9
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 27.3
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 49.7
80% 49.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI GENE Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE - $133

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $547
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback