Gigabyte GA-B85M-D2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D2V  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJan 18 '18 at 18:53
Run Duration619 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$36
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 125
47% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 148
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 3.19
2% 3 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 402
Mixed 416
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 45.5
169% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 91.4
103% 179 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Transcend SSD340 64GB-$57
20GB free
Firmware: SVN423b Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 335
Write 82.1
Mixed 128
39% 182 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 17.1
102% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 22.9
41% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 64%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
926GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 84.8
Write 79.6
Mixed 74.7
60% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.47
103% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 61%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
329GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 84.6
Write 88.2
Mixed 87.7
66% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.41
101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$150
269GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 79
Write 75.8
Mixed 70.7
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.38
107% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 51%
Maxtor 3200 500GB
161GB free, PID 3200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 4.17
Mixed 18.9
20% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.34
67% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 16%
Verbatim STORE N GO 64GB
47GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Read 16
Write 6.09
Mixed 7.19
11% 9.76 MB/s
4K Read 3.47
4K Write 0.49
4K Mixed 0.32
40% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 10%
FCR-HS3 -1 4GB
4GB free, PID 6348
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 4.39
Mixed 6.96
11% 11 MB/s
4K Read 2.43
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.09
12% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D2V Builds (Compare 959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D2V - $94

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback