Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '21 at 16:56
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 76.6 1-Core 126 2-Core 246 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 893 82% 688 Pts	64-Core 1,324 82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Vega Frontier Edition-$1,000 1,949 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1600 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.Q1.2 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.3% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 100 Parallax 189 93% 134 fps	MRender 90.2 Gravity 122 Splatting 74.7 76% 95.7 fps
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 92%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB 28,058 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,523 Write 5,724 Mixed 5,968 1,354% 6,072 MB/s	4K Read 406 4K Write 215 4K Mixed 262 1,064% 294 MB/s	DQ Read 1,161 DQ Write 832 DQ Mixed 933 714% 975 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 122%
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 24GB free Firmware: Z3311000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 481 Write 430 Mixed 383 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 14.4 95% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 25 74% 155 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 70%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 81GB free Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 45 46 48 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 4.7 Write 3.2 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 45.9 11% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 62GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 150 152 153 140 147 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 99.5 Write 111 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 145 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 113%
Toshiba MK1059GSM 1TB 4,891 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 260GB free Firmware: GL002C SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 64 62 63 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 48 Write 47.6 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 62.2 32% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 49%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB 2,475 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 57GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 37 38 38 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 134 Write 60.2 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 45.8 93% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.5 146% 3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CTD 32GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	83% Excellent	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 27.7 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 25.3 SC Write 32.4 SC Mixed 27.7 81% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 87.1 46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	120	27"	1280 720	IPX0000 IP2741

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	425x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	64x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	42x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,069

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16