Biostar H81MLV3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H81MLV3  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 23:19
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 100
2-Core 189
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 354
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Biostar(1565 1110) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 7.1
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$24
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 173 177 180 177 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 184
Mixed 37
SusWrite 178
107% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
323GB free
Firmware: GG2ZBD90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 98 98 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 96.6
61% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 8GB
3GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 1.7 3.3 3.6 3.2 3.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 20.6
Write 9.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 2.9
12% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.5% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 3R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 6% 86 27 19 60 21.5" 1920 1080 ACR056B Acer ET221Q
Typical H81MLV3 Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MLV3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $43
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback