Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B150M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 08:07
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 54%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 188
63% 113 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 189
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 67.4
Parallax 62.2
53% 65 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 62.3
53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 45 47 22 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 461
Write 388
Mixed 377
SusWrite 83.1
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 1.1
50% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 0.5
56% 134 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
156GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 113 127 127 101 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 138
Write 132
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 113
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBR 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 8.6
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 8R 5G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 53% 30 219 100 60 23.8" 1920 1080 AUS24A7 ASUS VL249HE
History: Score 52: 7R 4G 5B | Score 58: 8R 5G 3B
Typical GA-B150M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 2,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $401
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback