HP p6510cs

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP p6510cs  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AA9
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100422
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '17 at 15:42
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 270-$20
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 49.2
2-Core 98
49% 75.4 Pts
4-Core 98.4
8-Core 97.4
13% 97.9 Pts
64-Core 99.2
6% 99.2 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Gigabyte(1458 226E) 1GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 13.8
9% 12.4 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 13.5
10% 12 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 146
Mixed 128
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.59
4K Mixed 0.22
94% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5471-032.A00LF 99U5471-032.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.1
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback