Biostar A960D+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar A960D+  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140904
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '21 at 01:40
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 60
2-Core 95.5
54% 81.4 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 248
28% 219 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
PwrHis(1787 2359) 2GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.7% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 54.9
35% 47.8 fps
MRender 44.3
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 31.7
31% 39.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 137 144 157 160 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 157
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 148
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5471-032.A00LF 99U5471-032.A00LF 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A960D+ Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $206
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback