Acer Aspire X3900

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire X3900 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer FIH57
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '21 at 14:28
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 132 53% 90.1 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 186 23% 177 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B E109) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	3.3% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 2.9 3% 4.37 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 5.3 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 820GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 241 241 245 234 234 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.7% Good	Read 256 Write 243 Mixed 240 SusWrite 235 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 49.8 4K Mixed 32.5 106% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 198 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 128%
Multiple Flash Reader 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 31GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.8% Very poor	Read 17.9 Write 17.4 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 18.1 24% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 3.1 212% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 16%
Genesys xD USB3 Reader 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 18GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 26 26 22 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.8% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 11.4 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 23.2 23% 19 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 54% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hitachi GU512303EP0202 4x2GB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.8% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 13.7 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 8.7 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire X3900 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3900

CPU
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	41x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	13x
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	15x
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5570AMDBench 4%, 12,172 samples	6x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,099 samples	5x
GU512303EP0202 GU502203EP0201 GU512303EP0202 GU502203EP0201 6GBHitachiBench 31%, 138 samples	4x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 3x2GBToshibaBench 31%, 210 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $83

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363