Acer Aspire X3900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire X3900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FIH57
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100403
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '21 at 10:54
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 386
44% 345 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
EVGA(3842 1430) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 224 219 221 222 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.3% Above average
Read 213
Write 228
Mixed 212
SusWrite 221
50% 219 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 21.5
90% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 193
142% 183 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 111%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 18.4
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 11
12% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
215% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 97%
Multiple Flash Reader 128GB
115GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 10 9.8 9.8 9.7 9.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 15
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 9.8
19% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.4
174% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 16%
WD Elements 1TB
65GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.7 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 21
Write 17.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 9.8
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba ACR256X64D3U1333C9 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3900 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $83
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback