Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive384% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '21 at 17:12
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 161
2-Core 320
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,194
107% 906 Pts
64-Core 2,169
134% 2,169 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 223
Reflection 268
Parallax 197
182% 229 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 158
Splatting 140
133% 167 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3296 1750 883 906 910 912 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
384% Outstanding
Read 3,004
Write 3,114
Mixed 3023
SusWrite 1,443
595% 2,646 MB/s
4K Read 82.4
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 113
374% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,444
DQ Write 1,231
DQ Mixed 1,333
1,000% 1,336 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 384%
Great: 442%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 180 182 185 181 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 194
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 181
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
338GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 99 98 98 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 90.1
Write 46.9
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 97.7
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 59%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
146GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 127 126 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 115
Write 96.2
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 127
137% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
164% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 63%
ST4000LM 024-2AN17V 4TB
134GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 40 40 40 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 32.1
Write 34
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 38.4
48% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
187% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 41.6
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 39.5
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $739
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback