Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 11:35
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 111
53% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 273
30% 240 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
ASRock(1849 03D6) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.74
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 24 0GB SSD
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 25 73 45 21 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.4% Below average
Read 236
Write 211
Mixed 204
SusWrite 61.4
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 16.1
78% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.6
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 21.1
29% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA 500GB
437GB free
Firmware: GM4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 86 88 90 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 88
Write 85.7
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 86.3
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 2.3
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback