Today's hottest deals

MSI NF725M-P43 (MS-7597)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7597
MotherboardMSI NF725M-P43 (MS-7597)  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110314
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateJun 13 '20 at 21:21
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 28.1
2-Core 42.3
35% 47.2 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 136
15% 118 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Sapphire(174B E193) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 7.17
Reflection 7
Parallax 5.53
6% 6.57 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 5.13
Splatting 5.65
4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDP725050GLA 500GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 18 21 26 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 18
Write 22.3
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 21.4
15% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 50%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
825GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 111 68 66 88 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 164
Write 156
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 96.4
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.6
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NF725M-P43 (MS-7597) Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI NF725M-P43 (MS-7597)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Very poor Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback