Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD5  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 36 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '21 at 09:36
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 975-$550
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 160
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 378
39% 312 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$241
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 108
Parallax 121
95% 115 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 105
Splatting 94.1
89% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 360GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 29 27 27 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 647
Write 22
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 24
129% 180 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 4.7
1,151% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 194%
Great: 204%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 39 38 41 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.4% Above average
Read 159
Write 18.8
Mixed 62
SusWrite 40.2
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.4
151% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36GB
null MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 18.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 13
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback