Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardSupermicro X8DT3
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110527
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 04:02
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5672
CPU 2, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 173
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 554
54% 445 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 3963) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 38
37% 41.7 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 39
Splatting 33.8
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 36%
ATI FirePro 3800 (FireGL) Graphics Adapter
AMD(1002 210A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 4.72
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 3.87
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 360GB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 581
Write 126
Mixed 225
231% 311 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 6.71
4K Mixed 4.14
1,168% 8.28 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 204%
Great: 204%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41HE4BAFA-DJ-E 4x4GB
4 of 12 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.4% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback