HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 00:45
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 127
49% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 209
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.9% Average
Lighting 54.3
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 48.8
44% 52.7 fps
MRender 41.9
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 44.7
38% 45.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 66 94 97 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 106
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 89.4
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 68%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
50GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 25.1
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 10.9
29% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.6
242% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 22%
ST980815 A 80GB
36GB free, PID 0272
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 24 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.1% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 28.4
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 24.2
35% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback