HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 11:59
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 92.8
51% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 186
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
HP(103C 1850) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.31
Parallax 4.56
5% 5.92 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 7.13
4% 5.11 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U256G 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4162000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 191 192 193 191 191 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 403
Write 356
Mixed 271
SusWrite 195
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 28
93% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 217
173% 242 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
233GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 121 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 120
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback