Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory9.77GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9.77GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory8.3 GB free of 9.76563 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1718 x 928 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '21 at 21:46
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 75
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 51.7
39% 53.7 Pts
4-Core 57.5
8-Core 55.5
8% 56.5 Pts
64-Core 60.4
4% 60.4 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405)
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.2.14
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 17
10% 16.8 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 16
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 64GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 245 235 213 110 7.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
60% Good
Read 561
Write 617
Mixed 587
SusWrite 172
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 25.9
85% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 10.2
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 14.9
10% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB Virtual RAM VMW-512MB Virtual RAM VMW-256MB Virtual RAM VMW-16MB 9GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
8192, 1024, 512, 256, 16 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 0.2
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback