Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1797 x 1185 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '22 at 03:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7 VH
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 49.6
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 84.9
45% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 86.2
8-Core 117
13% 102 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.3.5
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
7.51% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 13.5
7% 10.5 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 10.2
8% 9.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.51%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 64GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 518 578 529 722 826 740 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 856
Write 658
Mixed 640
SusWrite 652
157% 702 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 24
80% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 85.8
DQ Mixed 100
74% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB 1x2GB
1 of 128 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 10.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 3.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 8 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback