Asus MAXIMUS VIII GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII GENE  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 02:37
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 553
74% 554 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 117
Parallax 99.4
86% 108 fps
MRender 99.3
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 104
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,852
Write 1,312
Mixed 1,193
322% 1,453 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 27.4
162% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 50.1
DQ Write 424
DQ Mixed 190
161% 221 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 212%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
78GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 413
Mixed 422
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 48.7
189% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 118
143% 251 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 148
Write 139
Mixed 132
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
390GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 73.2
Write 95.2
Mixed 99.1
68% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.56
4K Mixed 0.34
111% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 72%
External AL2_12345678_0_B 2TB
2TB free, PID 1670
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 30
Write 30.9
Mixed 18.6
33% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.56
4K Mixed 0.37
103% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 19%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
15GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 9.24
Mixed 10.2
15% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.82
4K Write 0.53
4K Mixed 0.46
52% 1.94 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.5
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 22.4
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII GENE Builds (Compare 1,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII GENE - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $714
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback