Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion VS409AA-ACP s5209at (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON EVANS
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100126
Uptime	6.3 Days
Run Date	May 23 '21 at 10:35
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5300-$59 18,604 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Memory 70.7 1-Core 37.1 2-Core 72.5 40% 60.1 Pts	4-Core 72.4 8-Core 73.7 10% 73.1 Pts	64-Core 73.8 5% 73.8 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210 3,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1B0A 9057) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.92 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.02% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 0.3 1% 0.63 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.02% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 110 53 52 51 52 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.3% Average	Read 222 Write 214 Mixed 197 SusWrite 83.4 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 33.7 4K Mixed 28.3 91% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 38 DQ Write 83.4 DQ Mixed 46.8 40% 56.1 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 118%
PNY GHook 3.0 32GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 14GB free, PID 6007 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 10 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	8.24% Terrible	Read 32.5 Write 12 Mixed 16 SusWrite 11.1 21% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.24% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM