Medionpc MS-7501

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Medionpc MS-7501 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDIONPC MS-7501
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090428
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '17 at 16:00
Run Duration	351 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9650-$125 2,698 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	41.4% Average	Memory 60.5 1-Core 27.3 2-Core 58.1 33% 48.6 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 130 18% 131 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4550 3,005 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E106) 512MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB 9,045 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 158 129 5058 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5001 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8578 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4980 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 44 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5001 (C2) HDA temperature 106 103 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	36.2% Below average	Read 66.8 Write 59 Mixed 57.7 46% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.32 90% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 49%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 26.9 Write 23.8 Mixed 25.2 32% 25.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.24 71% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 73%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 197GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 19%
Generic2 Card Reader2 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 30GB free, PID 6360 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.1% Very poor	Read 19.1 Write 17.9 Mixed 16.4 23% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.32 4K Write 2.73 4K Mixed 1.79 170% 2.95 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 8.8 22% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 6 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7501 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7501

CPU
Phenom X3 8450AMDBench 39%, 1,789 samples	3x
Athlon 7750AMDBench 39%, 2,273 samples	3x
Athlon II X3 425AMDBench 42%, 1,367 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
520 Series 240GBIntel $139Bench 78%, 12,595 samples	1x
HG6 mSATA 128GBToshibaBench 71%, 3,217 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	4x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363