Dell Latitude E6430s

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E6430s  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0N9T9J
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 21:56
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3540M-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 144
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 210
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 057D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6
Parallax 3.12
4% 4.58 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.35
5% 5.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM13D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 183 176 173 192 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 387
Write 207
Mixed 214
SusWrite 184
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 17.3
63% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 69.9
DQ Mixed 120
101% 152 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 68%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
154GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 11
Write 16.5
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 25
26% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung Latumab 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6430s Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6430s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback